Evidence-based practice requires critical analysis of current policies, practice, activities and research. A literature review enables a student or researcher to explore the existing evidence, evaluate the strength of this evidence and suggest further action.
The topic for the review, or research question, must be manageable though and feasible within the time available and the context of other academic and personal responsibilities.
Tools like PICO can help you to ensure your research question is robust, or to ensure you have a valid focus for your review.
Use one of the many tools available, e.g. Gantt chart, to plot the timeline for your project. One option is to use the Project Planner feature within Sage Research Methods resource.
Time management can be a critical factor when searching for literature. Planning ahead can be especially useful so consider compiling a search strategy to help you develop your search and select material appropriately.
So, what does a search strategy involve?
Do you need to document the number of entries found?
If so, a variation/simplification of the PRISMA flow diagram will be useful
Searching, especially when using bibliographic databases, can be a complex task as so many journal articles and other items are indexed. Structuring your search using Boolean terms "AND", "OR" and "NOT" will be particularly helpful, e.g. (Students OR undergraduates) AND (impact OR effect OR implications) AND Covid-19.
Other options are also in common use though.
Looking for a specific item?
Use the author's surname and the whole title, or one or more words from the title. For example, Saunders research methods
Searching for items on a topic?
Enter the key words defining the topic, e.g. business research methods
Looking for a set phrase?
Use quotation marks to search for an exact term, e.g. "primary school"
Not sure about the spelling?
Check the database or other site to see which symbols, if any, can be used as wildcards. If supported, you can simultaneously search different spellings of a word.
For example, in EBSCOhost databases, wom?n will generate results for woman and women (one letter difference); lab#r for labor and labour (multiple letters are possibly different).
You will be assessing the quality and relevance of your many sources, as recommended in our Evaluating Sources guide, during the literature review and, sometimes, later phases of your project.
In addition, you may also be expected to take account of scholarly research evaluation tools. These can be seen in some of the bibliographic databases, e.g. Scopus and Web of Science. These tools include:
Prefer other tools, e.g. the checklists listed below, when evaluating the quality of research in clinical trials and other health-focused research studies.